About
About this site
Who writes these pages, which seven documents they may quote, how the site is paid, and the one block of material that arrived with this product and is deliberately not printed here.
Maxorine is the retail desk that operates this site. It is not the manufacturer of Maxorin, it is not the brand, and it did not formulate the capsule. Every page is written from the label artwork and from seven named public sources. Where a figure was never printed, the page says so rather than estimating it — which on this product means saying it often, because 95% of the capsule by weight sits in a blend with no amounts on it. Clicking through to the checkout is a commercial link.
What this desk is, and what it is not
Maxorine is a u.s. stocking partner for maxorin. The bottle carries the line Distributed by: Maxorin, Aurora, CO 80011 — a company name, a city, a state and a zip — and that block is the only physical identifier on the product. We did not make the capsule, choose the rows on the panel or write the marketing.
The pages are written by the Maxorine editorial desk, which describes a job rather than a claim to credentials. Nobody here is a physician or a pharmacist, and nothing on this site is medical advice. The desk reads the artwork, reads the seven cited documents, finishes whatever arithmetic the label permits, and says so when there is none — which on six of the eight rows is the case.
Three parties attach to one purchase and it is worth keeping them apart. This site can publish what the label says, finish the arithmetic it permits and correct a page. The order desk — +1 (323) 348-1373 and [email protected] — can see an order, track a parcel and open a refund. The distributor, Maxorin, Aurora, CO 80011, is the name printed on the bottle. The contact page sets out all three in full.
How a page on this site gets written
- Read the label artwork at full resolution. Not the sales page and not the marketing panels. Where the artwork and the panel disagree, the panel wins and the disagreement is printed.
- Transcribe what is printed, exactly. Three rows: niacin 20 mg / 125%, zinc 11 mg / 100%, and a 570 mg Proprietary Blend naming six ingredients in the order the label sets them.
- Finish the arithmetic the label permits — and no more. Both percentages check out against the FDA’s Daily Values. The blend permits one kind of sum: since the ingredients must be in descending order of weight, the item in position n cannot exceed 570 divided by n. Six ceilings, none printed on the bottle and all six forced by it.
- Verify every citation at the source. All seven documents were opened and read, and every quotation is copied from the page it is attributed to. Where a source is silent, the page reports the silence.
- Publish the gaps. Where a figure was never printed, the page says so. No typical values, no industry averages, and above all no amount stated for anything inside the blend.
Step three is this site’s whole contribution, and its limit needs stating. A ceiling is not an amount. “At most 285 mg” is a true statement about the L-carnitine in this capsule; “285 mg” would be an invented one. A blend could hold one ingredient at 565 mg and five at a milligram each without changing a character of the label.
Step two is where the credit belongs. Before anything is criticised: two correct Daily Value percentages, the chemical form stated for both nutrients, species and plant part for all four botanicals, a complete Other Ingredients line, and the fullest caution block in this batch. None of it was compulsory.
The seven documents, and why the list stops there
Every regulatory and research claim on this site comes from one of seven public documents, quoted in their own wording. None of them sells supplements.
FDA — Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide, Chapter IV
This site’s central argument: a blend’s total weight on the same line as its name, and its ingredients “in descending order of predominance by weight”. That sentence makes the six ceilings computable.
FDA — Daily Value on the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels
The reference table. Niacin 16 mg, zinc 11 mg — which is how this desk confirmed that both printed percentages are correct.
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — Niacin
The Tolerable Upper Intake Level of 35 mg for adults, and the flushing threshold for nicotinic acid — which is why this site notes that the form is not stated.
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — Zinc
The Upper Intake Level of 40 mg, and the sentence comparing absorption from zinc citrate and gluconate with zinc oxide.
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — Carnitine
The only substantial file behind any blend ingredient, and it points away from the product: healthy people do not need supplemental carnitine.
NCCIH — Grape Seed Extract
Cited for a negative reason and flagged as such wherever it appears. The label says grape skin; this monograph is about the seed, a different part of the plant.
FDA — Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements
The sentence repeated whenever approval comes up: under DSHEA the FDA cannot approve dietary supplements before they are marketed.
Not on the list: retailers, ingredient suppliers, health publishers, trade bodies and the manufacturer’s own literature. The consequence is accepted deliberately. L-citrulline, pine bark extract, maca root and saffron stigma extract return no monograph at all at the bodies this desk reads, so four of the six blend ingredients have neither a published amount nor a citable file. Absence of a monograph is absence of information, not evidence in either direction.
What arrived with this product, and what is not here
The rules above mean nothing unless the refusals are on the record.
The standing rule, stated once
No before-and-after photographs, ever, on any product, for any reason. A transformation image is the most persuasive object that can be put on a page in this trade. It is not a sentence, so it requires no substantiation, and it communicates a result more forcefully than any wording a regulator would permit. The rule does not depend on the product, which is the point of it.
What was supplied was a review block: 4.5 out of 5, 1,125 written reviews, 7,897 orders, 86 per cent recommending, a line saying most customers wait 3–6 weeks, and eight named customers, all of them men aged between 39 and 65 — a shape no real customer base has had. None of it is reproduced here, and there is no AggregateRating in this site’s structured data.
The reason is not that the numbers are implausible on their own. It is what arrived beside them. A second pack reached this desk in the same batch, for a chewable oral-health tablet from a different company in an unrelated category, carrying the same block with the figures changed: 4.6 out of 5, 925 written reviews, 5,724 orders, the same wait line and the same eight-customer layout. The marketing graphics match too, box for box, with only the colour and the bottle altered.
Review data that arrives as a template with the numbers swapped is not review data. It is layout copy, and passing it on would mean publishing the shape of evidence with nothing inside it. No timeline is printed here either: the 3–6 week line is a marketing sentence, not a finding, and no trial of this formula exists. The verdict page sets out the empty slot in full.
Publishing what is missing
The most distinctive section on this site is a list of absences, printed with the same weight as anything that was supplied. The full list runs to thirteen items and sits on the FAQ. These are the five that cost the most:
- The amount of every one of the six blend ingredients — 570 of the 601 mg in the capsule. Six numbers, one line of print, and without them nobody can check the formula against anything.
- A standardisation for any of the four botanicals. Species and plant part are printed for all four, which is good practice. The next column — which compound the extract is concentrated for — is blank.
- Which form of niacin the 20 mg is. Nicotinic acid and niacinamide are both “niacin”, and only one of them flushes.
- A street address for the distributor. The artwork gives Maxorin, Aurora, CO 80011 — a postal region with nothing inside it, and no premises anyone can resolve.
- A Certificate of Analysis, or any named testing laboratory. This desk holds the reference MAX-7896-26-MA and not the document.
The lot and certificate references — MAX-26/MA-7896 and MAX-7896-26-MA — are labelled wherever they appear as draft references, not laboratory proof.
If something here is wrong, email [email protected] with the page and the correction. A panel on a bottle in your hand that differs from the transcription here is the most valuable message we receive. Last updated September 24, 2026.
How this site is funded
Maxorine earns a commission when an order is placed through the checkout link on this site. Clicking through to the checkout is a commercial link, and the price is the same whether you use it or not. That is a conflict of interest, disclosed in the footer of every page rather than buried on this one. The only honest test of the rules above is what the site does when following them costs it money, so here is the ledger.
Where following the rules costs this desk money
- The recommendation is the two-bottle pack at $178.00: the smallest money on the list, the worst value per capsule at $2.97, and the lowest commission. It is the only pack that finishes inside the return window.
- The score published here is 2.3 out of 5, with four of the six rows marked 2 and the reasoning printed beside every one.
- The reviews page carries no rating and no testimonials, where stars would rank better.
- Four ingredient entries conclude that nothing citable exists.
What the commission does not buy
- An amount for anything inside the blend. Only ceilings, always labelled as ceilings.
- A softened sentence about carnitine. The NIH’s line is quoted in full, repeatedly.
- A rating, a review count, a testimonial or a timeline.
- A claim the label does not make. The one starred claim is checked, not repeated.
Read this page as a set of commitments a reader can hold the site to. If a rating appears here, or a transformation photograph, or a blend ingredient quoted as an amount rather than a ceiling, this page is the evidence that something changed.
Read the blend row first, then decide
Thirty capsules, one a day. Two named nutrients with percentages that both check out, and then 570 of the 601 milligrams in the capsule inside a proprietary blend with no amounts on it. The live price and the 60-day return terms are both on the seller’s checkout screen.
60-day window · Questions first? Call +1 (323) 348-1373