U.S. stocking partner for Maxorin30 capsules · one a day570 of 601 mg inside a blendDraft lot MAX-26/MA-7896+1 (323) 348-1373

Verification

Maxorin batch and certificate references

By the Maxorin Editorial Desk · Last updated September 24, 2026 · how we check facts

What a lot number is for, what a Certificate of Analysis would actually tell you, what this desk was given instead, and why on this particular product the certificate is the single most useful thing a buyer can ask for.

The pack supplied a lot reference of MAX-26/MA-7896 and a certificate reference of MAX-7896-26-MA. Both are draft references from a seller pack. Neither is laboratory proof of anything. No Certificate of Analysis document reached this desk, no testing laboratory is named anywhere in the material, and no best-before date was legible on the images supplied.

What a lot number is for

A lot number identifies a production run. It is the string that lets a manufacturer say which batch a particular bottle came from, and it is what makes a recall possible: without it, a problem found in one run cannot be separated from every other bottle ever made.

It is useful to a buyer in exactly one way. If you ever need to raise something about a specific bottle — a broken seal, a capsule that looks wrong, a reaction — the lot number on that bottle is the first thing anyone will ask for. It is not a quality mark, it does not indicate testing, and it says nothing at all about what is in the capsule.

The reference supplied with this product is MAX-26/MA-7896. What arrived with it was a seller pack, not a bottle, so this desk cannot confirm that the string appears on the physical label, where on the label it appears, or what the bottle in your hand says. The lot number on your own bottle is the only one that counts. Read it off the bottle rather than off this page.

And the date that is missing

No best-before date was legible on the images supplied. That is a statement about the photographs this desk was given, not a claim that the bottles carry no date — but it means the expiry is one more thing to check on the doorstep rather than here. The full doorstep checklist is on the shipping page.

What a Certificate of Analysis reports

A Certificate of Analysis is a laboratory document about a specific lot. It is issued by a laboratory, it names that laboratory, it carries a date and a lot reference, and it reports the results of tests actually performed on material from that run.

A full one typically reports several things, and it is worth knowing which of them matter here.

  • Identity — that the material is what the label says it is, confirmed by a named method.
  • Quantity per ingredient — how much of each declared ingredient the tested material actually contained. This is the row that matters on this product.
  • Contaminants — heavy metals, microbial counts, and whatever else the specification calls for, each against a stated limit.
  • The laboratory, the date and the lot — without all three, a certificate cannot be tied to anything.

A reference number is none of that. MAX-7896-26-MA is a string. A certificate is a document with results on it, and the two are not versions of the same thing.

This is worth stating plainly because a certificate reference printed without a certificate is one of the commonest pieces of reassurance in this trade. It looks like evidence of testing and it establishes nothing, because there is nothing to read.

Why the CoA is the request worth making here

On most products a Certificate of Analysis is a nice-to-have. On this one it is the document that would resolve the central question about the formula, and that makes asking for it the single most useful thing a buyer of this product can do.

Here is why. The Supplement Facts panel has three rows. Two of them — niacin at 20 mg and zinc at 11 mg — are itemised, checkable and arithmetically correct. The third is a 570 mg Proprietary Blend of six ingredients with no individual amounts, which is about 95% of the 601 mg in the capsule by weight. Nothing on the label says how that 570 mg is divided, and nothing requires it to.

A Certificate of Analysis reports quantity per ingredient. That is precisely the column the label omits. A CoA for this lot would say how much L-citrulline, how much L-carnitine, how much pine bark, maca, grape skin and saffron are actually in the capsule — and would turn six ceilings into six numbers.

At present the only quantities anyone can state about those six are the ceilings forced by the FDA’s descending-order rule: 570, 285, 190, 142.5, 114 and 95 mg by position. Those are real and they are useful, and they are also the weakest possible form of information — a ceiling of 285 mg is equally consistent with 285 mg and with one milligram. The full table and the arithmetic behind it are on the label page.

So the request is not a formality and it is not a test of the seller’s good faith. It is the one document that would answer the question this entire site keeps running into. If a buyer asks for only one thing before paying, it should be this.

What we were actually given

Set out plainly, with the status of each item rather than an impression of it.

Batch and testing materialWhat arrived with this product
Lot referenceSupplied: MAX-26/MA-7896 — a draft reference from a seller pack
Certificate referenceSupplied: MAX-7896-26-MA — a reference, with no document behind it
Certificate of Analysis documentNot supplied. No file, no results, nothing to read
Testing laboratoryNot named anywhere in the material
Test dateNot supplied
Best-before dateNot legible on the images supplied
Country of manufactureNot printed. Not printed. No country of manufacture appears on the artwork supplied.
ManufacturerNot named. A GMP mark was supplied with no certifying body behind it

Two references, and nothing they refer to. This site therefore reproduces no laboratory result, names no laboratory and reprints no certificate, because it has none of the three.

None of that means the product was not tested. It means this desk cannot tell you whether it was, by whom, or with what result — and the difference between those two statements is the whole of what a verification page is for.

The print code on the artwork edge

A string reading EVRB_420_01_080626 runs along the edge of the label artwork. It is recorded here because it is exactly the sort of thing that gets mistaken for something it is not.

It is a production code for the label file — a version marker for the artwork, used by whoever prepares and prints the labels. It is not an ingredient, not a lot number, not a test reference and not a claim. It says nothing about the capsules and nothing about the batch.

Three things a buyer might reasonably mistake it for, and why it is none of them. It is not the lot number, which is MAX-26/MA-7896 in the material supplied. It is not the certificate reference, which is MAX-7896-26-MA. And it is not a date code that could be read as an expiry — no best-before was legible on the images at all.

Recording it is the point. A site that publishes only the strings that flatter a product is not a record, and a reader who spots this one on their own bottle deserves to find it explained rather than to wonder.

How to ask, and what to ask for

Three routes, one question, and a way of phrasing it that is difficult to answer with reassurance instead of a document.

  • The order line — +1 (323) 348-1373, the order-status line given in the seller pack. Fastest, and the right route if you also want to ask about the pack or the window.
  • The sales email — [email protected]. Slower and better, because a document can be attached to a reply and a reply is a record.
  • The label email — [email protected], printed on the bottle beside the distributor’s telephone number, +1 (323) 395-2817.

Ask for the document, not for an assurance: please send the Certificate of Analysis for the lot on my bottle, including per-ingredient quantities for the proprietary blend. That sentence is specific about the file, the lot and the column that matters, and it cannot be satisfied by a sentence about quality standards.

If a certificate arrives, three things are worth checking before it settles anything: that it names a laboratory, that it carries the lot number on your bottle, and that it reports quantities per ingredient rather than only identity or contaminants. A certificate that omits any of the three is a document about something other than the question you asked.

And whatever comes back, the website email on this site — [email protected], Monday to Friday, 9 to 5 Eastern — cannot obtain one for you. It has no visibility of orders, no relationship with any laboratory and no access to the seller’s files. If a certificate ever reaches this desk it will be published here, and the page will say who issued it.

Read the blend row first, then decide

Thirty capsules, one a day. Two named nutrients with percentages that both check out, and then 570 of the 601 milligrams in the capsule inside a proprietary blend with no amounts on it. The live price and the 60-day return terms are both on the seller’s checkout screen.

60-day window · Questions first? Call +1 (323) 348-1373

Keep reading

Maxorin · two bottles $178.0030 capsules · one a day · 570 of 601 mg inside the blend
Order now